They May Not Have Thought This Through
Nov. 2nd, 2010 03:50 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Recently in the news is the American TSA (you know, the nice uniformed people in airports who do security) and their new technique for discouraging people from opting out of those awful body scanner security theatre devices. Apparently they have gone in for very public, very intimate pat downs, presumably in an attempt to humiliate refuseniks into using the "perve at your naked body scanners".
One source quotes someone in the know:
Passengers have reported feeling unpleasantly surprised at the intimacy of the searches, but I can't help feeling that the TSA haven't thought this through very clearly, because there's an obvious problem with this from their point of view, which I think I can illustrate with this video:
Just saying...
Also posted at http://auntysarah.dreamwidth.org/248323.html - you can comment here or there.
One source quotes someone in the know:
An effective pat down "has to be invasive" and touch both breasts and genitals, says Billie Vincent, a former security director for the Federal Aviation Administration. "It is clearly a technique that most people would consider an invasion of their privacy."
Passengers have reported feeling unpleasantly surprised at the intimacy of the searches, but I can't help feeling that the TSA haven't thought this through very clearly, because there's an obvious problem with this from their point of view, which I think I can illustrate with this video:
Just saying...
Also posted at http://auntysarah.dreamwidth.org/248323.html - you can comment here or there.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 06:22 pm (UTC)Still like the stories of people going through the scanners after taking viagra :-) Have you heard that the scanners are becoming compulsory at Manchester Airport?