You must have been very close to taking the final practicals; Go on - go for it girl!!! Much better than other shiny things. And before any one says piloting is not a girly thing; there were 5 of us girls who passed out within a few months of each other.
The problem was having to book lessons weeks ahead because the flying school was so busy, and then they'd get cancelled due to the weather, so I was spending a whole lot of money to stay still.
If I were to do it again I'd have to start from scratch more or less, and I don't really have the motivation or funds to get into that.
...buuuuut after watching the vid, also kinda scary what with being a spydrone and all. I can see occasion where a user may end up with an "inoperable" gadget, after pissing me off / scaring me with their anonymous-but-ominous buzzing spy.
Also, Merseyside Police got bitchslapped for using their one just this week (BBC story);
"All unmanned aircraft, not just ones that weigh 15lb (7kg) or more, now have to be licensed to conduct aerial surveillance work after the law changed at the start of the year.
They need CAA permission to fly within 164ft (50m) of people and within 492ft (150m) of buildings.
The CAA said any breach in regulations, which came into force on 1 January 2010, would be "treated seriously"."
BTW, The Beeb's pic is wrong, The plod's one isn't a fat bastard, but is still notably unmarked...
All unmanned aircraft, not just ones that weigh 15lb (7kg) or more, now have to be licensed to conduct aerial surveillance work after the law changed at the start of the year
Will just have to be careful to use it for recreation rather than surveillance.
Ok, myself and twiggy_j just had an academic disagreement as to if the gadget you posted would be covered by said CAA remit. I say ye, she sez neh.
Poking about... we get The Air Navigation Order 2009 (the mentioned just-activated regs). Which, to put briefly, says (in S.166+167) "Small unmanned aircraft " can be flown anywhere bar airports and >400ft, while "Small unmanned surveillance aircraft" need to be licensed at all times. And what makes a small unmanned aircraft of the surveillance variety?
"(5) In this article ‘a small unmanned surveillance aircraft’ means a small unmanned aircraft which is equipped to undertake any form of surveillance or data acquisition."
Ergo, I'd say this gadget can only be used by CAA licensed peeps, full stop. Don't pass Court.
I further note that something which will primarily be used indoors by many people is none of their damned business.
Actually, since this thing is running Linux, I wonder how long it is before someone makes one that uses some sort of machine intelligence to be autonomous. That way it could fly itself to where it was going, using GPS, do stuff and then come home. That genuinely would be useful for surveillance, because it's not limited by the rather short range of wifi.
I can just see it. Proud owner flies hir newest toy into the living room. Kitty wakes up and says "BAT! KILL!!!". Vet bill does not include cost of replacing now-mangled toy...
no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 02:34 pm (UTC)(I also want a drone)
no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 02:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 02:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 03:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 05:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 05:41 pm (UTC)(BTW I have a pilots licence and you will NEVER ever get me up in anything that hovers unless it has two engines)
no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 05:42 pm (UTC)Pity really. Did solo navigation and everything.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 06:05 pm (UTC)If I were to do it again I'd have to start from scratch more or less, and I don't really have the motivation or funds to get into that.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 08:02 pm (UTC)...buuuuut after watching the vid, also kinda scary what with being a spydrone and all. I can see occasion where a user may end up with an "inoperable" gadget, after pissing me off / scaring me with their anonymous-but-ominous buzzing spy.
Also, Merseyside Police got bitchslapped for using their one just this week (BBC story);
BTW, The Beeb's pic is wrong, The plod's one isn't a fat bastard, but is still notably unmarked...
no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 08:10 pm (UTC)Will just have to be careful to use it for recreation rather than surveillance.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 08:17 pm (UTC)Poking about... we get The Air Navigation Order 2009 (the mentioned just-activated regs). Which, to put briefly, says (in S.166+167) "Small unmanned aircraft
" can be flown anywhere bar airports and >400ft, while "Small unmanned surveillance aircraft" need to be licensed at all times. And what makes a small unmanned aircraft of the surveillance variety?
Ergo, I'd say this gadget can only be used by CAA licensed peeps, full stop. Don't pass Court.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 08:25 pm (UTC)Actually, since this thing is running Linux, I wonder how long it is before someone makes one that uses some sort of machine intelligence to be autonomous. That way it could fly itself to where it was going, using GPS, do stuff and then come home. That genuinely would be useful for surveillance, because it's not limited by the rather short range of wifi.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 08:13 pm (UTC)Well. You could. Wouldn't be much left of the window, i imagine.
I want a smaller one I can ride on and control from an iPhone!
no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 09:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-19 08:23 am (UTC)Message for you on your SL email account btw!
no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 08:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-18 10:22 pm (UTC)I want one too
Date: 2010-02-23 01:48 am (UTC)Re: I want one too
Date: 2010-02-23 01:49 am (UTC)Re: I want one too
Date: 2010-02-23 01:51 am (UTC)