You have a different readding of this than I do. My reading is that the Mail's subtext is that Nina is nit her "real" name, that it's fake, that she merely "wishes to be known" as Nina.I think they chose how to write about this, the language they use and the aspects they report, to be as sensational (and as disrespectful) as possible. I think you're being quite charitable here, and I'm not at all sure it's deserved.